<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ANV driver doesn't release memory" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107899#c18">Comment # 18</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - ANV driver doesn't release memory" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107899">bug 107899</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ryao@gentoo.org" title="Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>"> Richard Yao</a> <pre>This might just be my lack of familiarity with the codebase, but why is ANV affected by this while RADV is not? I do not have any hardware to use to study how RADV works, but at a glance, it is relatively easy to see the fence bits being handled in the i915 GEM code while I am unable to tell at a glance how the amdgpu GEM code uses them. It seems to be done in a very abstract way in the amdgpu_cs.c file and it is not clear to me how that gets invoked by RADV. I am curious if the difference might point to the possibility that ANV is overly aggressive at fencing. I believe that DXVK should be making the same API calls on both.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>