<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [CI][BAT] igt@gem_workarounds@basic-read - fail - Failed assertion: workaround_fail_count(fd, ctx) == 0" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107338#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [CI][BAT] igt@gem_workarounds@basic-read - fail - Failed assertion: workaround_fail_count(fd, ctx) == 0" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107338">bug 107338</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>(In reply to Talha Nassar from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107338#c4">comment #4</a>) > After investigating this issue, it appears that the register is holding the > value to set WaEnableFloatBlendOptimization. The issue is that HW currently > does not have this register muxed to be read. This test reads bit4 to check > if the WA is enabled but returns 0 for the aforementioned reason. > > For ICL, the register is used to enable this feature and remains so. This > will only move to a state cmd for next gen. > > Can we merge back the patch that was reverted? Submit a patch to set the register and *not* mark it as being required for read back by the test.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>