<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - per-process/context memory usage accounting for i915" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106136#c13">Comment # 13</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - per-process/context memory usage accounting for i915" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106136">bug 106136</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eero.t.tamminen@intel.com" title="Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>"> Eero Tamminen</a> <pre>(In reply to Lakshmi from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=106136#c12">comment #12</a>) > Importance is set as Enhancement. E.g. GPU virtualization isn't worth much unless GPU memory usage can be controlled (like other memory usage), so I think fixing this DRI security issue is a pre-condition for virtualization. Does GPU virtualization have also enhancement priority? Note: in addition to 3D, which is more of a desktop client matter, this concerns also video, which is more of a server concern (like virtualization). It's trivial to use HW accelerated pipelines with MediaSDK that take all the RAM in the machine through non-swappable GEM objects. One just needs to specify enough streams for the video pipeline and result is mystery OOM kills for rest of the system.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>