<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded - dmesg-warn - page allocation failure" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108686#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded - dmesg-warn - page allocation failure" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108686">bug 108686</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> Martin Peres</a> <pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108686#c1">comment #1</a>) > Note it didn't cause a rendering error, so was just a transient allocation > failure under heavy mempressure, so not really a bug, just the usual noise. > Our only goal here is to make sure direct-reclaim is effective to never > allow a preventable order-0 allocation failure. Shouldn't we hide this message then? If not, this means that we would not catch anything happening when this failure happens. If this is OK, let's close with NOTABUG, but I will keep the issue in cibuglog.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>