<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_eio@in-flight-*-(10ms|1us|immediate) - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed < 250e6"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107799#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_eio@in-flight-*-(10ms|1us|immediate) - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed < 250e6"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107799">bug 107799</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107799#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Martin Peres from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107799#c4">comment #4</a>)
> > <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_135/fi-bwr-2160/">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_135/fi-bwr-2160/</a>
> > igt@<a href="mailto:gem_eio@wait-immediate.html">gem_eio@wait-immediate.html</a>
> >
> > Starting subtest: wait-immediate
> > (gem_eio:882) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_wait, file
> > ../tests/i915/gem_eio.c:258:
> > (gem_eio:882) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: elapsed < 250e6
> > (gem_eio:882) CRITICAL: Wake up following reset+wedge took 290.703ms
> > Subtest wait-immediate failed.
>
> Fwiw, bwr appears to be slowed down by display post-reset probing. Tempting
> to move that into its own thread, if it can't be dramatically sped up since
> the state is known.</span >
Well, that could explain :)
(In reply to Joonas Lahtinen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107799#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> After some discussion, agreement is that the issue is actually an
> intermittent scheduling delay for the userspace process. So it is an issue,
> but not really high and could also be something outside of our scope.
> Changing importance to low for reconsideration.</span >
Scheduling delay resulting in over 1s latency? That sounds odd and could easily
be worked-around by changing the scheduling policy to realtime.
Anyway, right now, we suppress:
- SNB BYT BSW GLK: igt@gem_eio@in-flight-*-(10ms|1us|immediate) - fail -
Failed assertion: elapsed < 250e6
- BWR: igt@gem_eio@wait-immediate - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed < 250e6
If you think the customer impact is really warranting a low, then go for it.
Otherwise, bump the priority to what you thing is acceptable.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>