<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com" title="Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Tvrtko Ursulin</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - System crashes seconds after a GPU hang with kernel newer than 4.18"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107945">bug 107945</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - System crashes seconds after a GPU hang with kernel newer than 4.18"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107945#c19">Comment # 19</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - System crashes seconds after a GPU hang with kernel newer than 4.18"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107945">bug 107945</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com" title="Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Tvrtko Ursulin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=142614" name="attach_142614" title="Bring back GT workaround application on the engine reset path">attachment 142614</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=142614&action=edit" title="Bring back GT workaround application on the engine reset path">[details]</a></span> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=107945&attachment=142614'>[review]</a>
Bring back GT workaround application on the engine reset path
That i915.reset=1 helps suggests your bisect result might be valid, since the
indicated commit did remove some workaround application from the engine reset
path (which i915.reset=1 disables).
Would you be able to test this patch on top of a known bad (for you) drm-tip
kernel? It is exploratory patch at this stage only, which puts back a class of
workaround application on the engine reset path. If so, this patch should be
tested with the default i915.reset=2 modparam.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>