<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][BAT] igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists - incomplete - possible circular locking dependency detected"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109567">109567</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>[CI][BAT] igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists - incomplete - possible circular locking dependency detected
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>DRI
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>XOrg git
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>Other
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>All
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>normal
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>medium
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>DRM/Intel
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>intel-gfx-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>martin.peres@free.fr
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>QA Contact</th>
<td>intel-gfx-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>intel-gfx-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre><a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5542/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5542/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html</a>
<0>[ 678.302656] ---------------------------------
<0>[ 678.302659] Kernel Offset: disabled
<4>[ 678.302662] CPU: 2 PID: 32 Comm: khungtaskd Tainted: G U W
5.0.0-rc5-CI-CI_DRM_5542+ #1
<4>[ 678.302664] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Ice Lake Client
Platform/IceLake U DDR4 SODIMM PD RVP TLC, BIOS
ICLSFWR1.R00.2402.AD3.1810170014 10/17/2018
<4>[ 678.302665] Call Trace:
<4>[ 678.302670] dump_stack+0x67/0x9b
<4>[ 678.302677] panic+0x12b/0x29d
<4>[ 678.302683] watchdog+0x36c/0x610
<4>[ 678.302687] ? hungtask_pm_notify+0x40/0x40
<4>[ 678.302690] kthread+0x119/0x130
<4>[ 678.302692] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
<4>[ 678.302696] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
<4>[ 678.302701]
<4>[ 678.302702] ======================================================
<4>[ 678.302702] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4>[ 678.302703] 5.0.0-rc5-CI-CI_DRM_5542+ #1 Tainted: G U
<4>[ 678.302703] ------------------------------------------------------
<4>[ 678.302704] rs:main Q:Reg/439 is trying to acquire lock:
<4>[ 678.302704] 0000000076c65446 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}, at:
down_trylock+0xa/0x30
<4>[ 678.302706]
<4>[ 678.302706] but task is already holding lock:
<4>[ 678.302706] 000000001735c509 (&rq->lock){-.-.}, at:
try_to_wake_up+0x1e0/0x5f0
<4>[ 678.302708]
<4>[ 678.302708] which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4>[ 678.302709]
<4>[ 678.302709]
<4>[ 678.302710] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4>[ 678.302710]
<4>[ 678.302710] -> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.}:
<4>[ 678.302712] task_fork_fair+0x36/0x160
<4>[ 678.302712] sched_fork+0x118/0x220
<4>[ 678.302713] copy_process.part.6+0x7b3/0x2220
<4>[ 678.302713] _do_fork+0xe2/0x6b0
<4>[ 678.302713] kernel_thread+0x20/0x30
<4>[ 678.302714] rest_init+0x1d/0x250
<4>[ 678.302714] start_kernel+0x499/0x4b9
<4>[ 678.302715] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
<4>[ 678.302715]
<4>[ 678.302715] -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}:
<4>[ 678.302717] try_to_wake_up+0x37/0x5f0
<4>[ 678.302717] up+0x3b/0x50
<4>[ 678.302717] __up_console_sem+0x2e/0x50
<4>[ 678.302718] console_unlock+0x311/0x600
<4>[ 678.302718] vprintk_emit+0xfe/0x320
<4>[ 678.302719] printk+0x4d/0x69
<4>[ 678.302719] drm_dbg+0x7f/0x90
<4>[ 678.302719] drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x35a/0x6e0
<4>[ 678.302720] drm_setup_crtcs+0x156/0xc90
<4>[ 678.302720] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x3e/0x570
<4>[ 678.302721] gen11_dsi_pre_enable+0x112f/0x1350 [i915]
<4>[ 678.302721] async_run_entry_fn+0x34/0x160
<4>[ 678.302721] process_one_work+0x245/0x610
<4>[ 678.302722] worker_thread+0x37/0x380
<4>[ 678.302722] kthread+0x119/0x130
<4>[ 678.302722] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
<4>[ 678.302723]
<4>[ 678.302723] -> #0 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}:
<4>[ 678.302724] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x33/0x50
<4>[ 678.302725] down_trylock+0xa/0x30
<4>[ 678.302725] __down_trylock_console_sem+0x20/0x80
<4>[ 678.302726] console_trylock+0xe/0x60
<4>[ 678.302726] vprintk_emit+0xf1/0x320
<4>[ 678.302726] printk+0x4d/0x69
<4>[ 678.302727] __warn_printk+0x46/0x90
<4>[ 678.302727] native_smp_send_reschedule+0x2f/0x40
<4>[ 678.302727] check_preempt_curr+0x81/0xa0
<4>[ 678.302728] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x14/0x220
<4>[ 678.302728] try_to_wake_up+0x216/0x5f0
<4>[ 678.302729] wake_up_q+0x4f/0x70
<4>[ 678.302729] futex_wake+0x152/0x170
<4>[ 678.302729] do_futex+0x45e/0xb10
<4>[ 678.302730] __se_sys_futex+0x12e/0x180
<4>[ 678.302730] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190
<4>[ 678.302730] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[ 678.302731]
<4>[ 678.302731] other info that might help us debug this:
<4>[ 678.302731]
<4>[ 678.302732] Chain exists of:
<4>[ 678.302732] (console_sem).lock --> &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock
<4>[ 678.302734]
<4>[ 678.302735] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4>[ 678.302735]
<4>[ 678.302735] CPU0 CPU1
<4>[ 678.302736] ---- ----
<4>[ 678.302736] lock(&rq->lock);
<4>[ 678.302737] lock(&p->pi_lock);
<4>[ 678.302738] lock(&rq->lock);
<4>[ 678.302739] lock((console_sem).lock);
<4>[ 678.302740]
<4>[ 678.302740] *** DEADLOCK ***
<4>[ 678.302740]</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>