<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@pm_rps@reset - dmesg-fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf_wr(fd, execbuf) == 0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109606#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@pm_rps@reset - dmesg-fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf_wr(fd, execbuf) == 0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109606">bug 109606</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=109606#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> commit 89531e7d8ee8602b2723431a581250d5d0ec2913
> Author: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>>
> Date: Tue Feb 26 09:49:19 2019 +0000
>
> drm/i915: Replace global_seqno with a hangcheck heartbeat seqno
>
> To determine whether an engine has 'stuck', we simply check whether or
> not is still on the same seqno for several seconds. To keep this simple
> mechanism intact over the loss of a global seqno, we can simply add a
> new global heartbeat seqno instead. As we cannot know the sequence in
> which requests will then be completed, we use a primitive random number
> generator instead (with a cycle long enough to not matter over an
> interval of a few thousand requests between hangcheck samples).
>
> The alternative to using a dedicated seqno on every request is to issue
> a heartbeat request and query its progress through the system. Sadly
> this requires us to reduce struct_mutex so that we can issue requests
> without requiring that bkl.
>
> v2: And without the extra CS_STALL for the hangcheck seqno -- we don't
> need strict serialisation with what comes later, we just need to be sure
> we don't write the hangcheck seqno before our batch is flushed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <<a href="mailto:tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com">tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com</a>>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <<a href="mailto:tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com">tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com</a>>
> Link:
> <a href="https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190226094922.31617-1">https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190226094922.31617-1</a>-
> <a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a></span >
Fair-enough! Thanks!</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>