<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@pm_rpm@* - dmesg-warn - *ERROR* DBus power enable timeout!" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108654#c21">Comment # 21</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@pm_rpm@* - dmesg-warn - *ERROR* DBus power enable timeout!" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108654">bug 108654</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:imre.deak@intel.com" title="Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>"> Imre Deak</a> <pre>(In reply to Martin Peres from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108654#c20">comment #20</a>) > (In reply to Jani Saarinen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108654#c19">comment #19</a>) > > Resolving again to wait CI results. > > There is NEEDINFO for that... > > And anyway, the patch is a workaround, not a fix. So re-opening. The patch does fix the problem where we tried to enable/disable DBuf slices incorrectly. As a result we shouldn't get the timeout error and possibly other related failures. So imo the reported bug is fixed, we shouldn't get these error messages/conditions. It would be also good to be certain in this by way of having the bug open only if the error messages/conditions reappear. The task to toggle the second Dbuf slice on-demand should be tracked separately imo.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>