<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI] igt@kms_plane-*@* - Failed CRC mismatch"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103166#c42">Comment # 42</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI] igt@kms_plane-*@* - Failed CRC mismatch"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103166">bug 103166</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Daniel Vetter from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103166#c39">comment #39</a>)
<span class="quote">> We need to close this one, this bug has become a mess:</span >
It has always been, but yeah, it is high time we do something about this bug!
<span class="quote">>
> - no more fifo underruns it seems</span >
\o/
<span class="quote">>
> At least 2 new bugs:
>
> 1. for igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes (also b/c ofc) on icl-u3:
>
> Crash signature is:
>
> Testing format NV12 (0x3231564e) on A.2
> Stack trace:
> #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1474 __igt_fail_assert()
> #1 ../lib/igt_debugfs.c:420 igt_assert_crc_equal()
> #2 ../tests/kms_plane.c:550 test_format_plane()
> #3 ../tests/kms_plane.c:582 test_pixel_formats()
> #4 ../tests/kms_plane.c:597 run_tests_for_pipe_plane()
> #5 ../tests/kms_plane.c:652 __real_main637()
> #6 ../tests/kms_plane.c:637 main()
> #7 ../csu/libc-start.c:344 __libc_start_main()
> #8 [_start+0x2a]
> Subtest pixel-format-pipe-A-planes: FAIL (547.114s)
> Test requirement not met in function run_tests_for_pipe_plane, file
> ../tests/kms_plane.c:593:
> Test requirement: !(pipe >= data->display.n_pipes)
>
> A.2 can also be B.2 for b-planes and C.2 for c-planes</span >
The test got reworked, and kms_plane issues on ICL are now tracked in:
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-[abc]-planes* - fail - all YUV formats fail after testing NV12 on plane 2"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=110032">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110032</a>
APL issues got moved to <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-[abc]-planes* - fail - WARNING: CRC mismatch with format YUYV (0x56595559) on [ABC].0"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=110033">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110033</a>
The others will get a per-platform bug as they pop up :)
(In reply to Daniel Vetter from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103166#c39">comment #39</a>)
<span class="quote">> 2. bug: igt@kms_plane_multiple@atomic * on icl-u3: No idea yet what's going
> on there.</span >
The issue has been split into this bug:
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_plane_multiple@atomic-pipe-[abc]-* - fail - Failed assertion: !mismatch, Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=110037">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110037</a>
<span class="quote">>
> 3. All the other platforms: Not sure it's a good idea to smash them all into
> one place. We need to at least separate the bugs where we also have a fifo
> underrun from crc mistmatches for other reasons. Since my igt patch
>
> commit 4d0d81a2176227a7432762ae095ba386f3c8aba0
> Author: Daniel Vetter <<a href="mailto:daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch">daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch</a>>
> Date: Tue Feb 19 10:11:06 2019 +0100
>
> lib/crc: Reset fifo underrun reporting for every crc capture
>
> we should be able to tell these two cases apart with 100% accuracy.</span >
Agreed... but not too sure how to proceed on this. I should create a view that
would allow me to mass-suppress tests in order to deal with this sort of
issues...
I also split the igt@kms_plane@plane-position-covered-pipe-[abc]-planes
failures to <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_plane@plane-position-covered-pipe-[abc]-planes - fail - Failed assertion: !mismatch"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=110038">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110038</a>
I will suppress some of the tests and remove them from the filter.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>