<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - [CI][BAT] igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a / igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip - fail - Failed assertion: nanosleep(&tv, NULL) == -1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103182#c14">Comment # 14</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - [CI][BAT] igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a / igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip - fail - Failed assertion: nanosleep(&tv, NULL) == -1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103182">bug 103182</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>commit f539e21e934019f0196fee646f351b4e30a8c341 (HEAD, upstream/master) Author: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>> Date: Mon Apr 1 08:55:20 2019 +0100 prime_vgem: Replace nanosleep with igt_waitchildren_timeout We want to use a child in order to detect an uninterruptable sleep (a potential bug we might hit), but we can use igt_waitchildren_timeout() to replace our risky self-signaling + nanosleep. v2: Remove the now redundant signal() setup. Bugzilla: <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - [CI][BAT] igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a / igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip - fail - Failed assertion: nanosleep(&tv, NULL) == -1" href="show_bug.cgi?id=103182">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103182</a> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <<a href="mailto:daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch">daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch</a>></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>