<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-* - fail - Failed assertion: shared[0] > vrefresh*target / 2" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103355#c19">Comment # 19</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-* - fail - Failed assertion: shared[0] > vrefresh*target / 2" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103355">bug 103355</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> Martin Peres</a> <pre>(In reply to Arek Hiler from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103355#c18">comment #18</a>) > The test is checking how many cursor updates we can fit between vblanks, and > treating that as a baseline. Then it does 30 flips and checks whether we fit > expected (num_of_flips * baseline / 8) amount of cursor updates. The check > is done 50 times. > > We fails this check but yet the cursor refresh rate for each failure is well > above 1k (per 30 flips) and there are really no sense in having mouses with > refresh rates higher than 1kHz. > > The customer impact is low. > > The test needs some rethinking and possibly updated pass criteria. Anusha, please update the test to clip the wanted refresh rate to 1kHz, anything above above is useless and just adds noise.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>