<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-flip-vs-cursor-legacy - incomplete - RIP: 0010:skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate+0x8b/0x2d0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109084#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-flip-vs-cursor-legacy - incomplete - RIP: 0010:skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate+0x8b/0x2d0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109084">bug 109084</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to James Ausmus from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=109084#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> Martin - how are you getting the "every 2.7 runs" data? From cibuglog, I'm
> seeing that this hasn't been seen in 4 weeks. Last seen was drmtip_243, and
> latest idle is drmtip_251, so 8 runs without seeing it</span >
This is an average throughout the lifetime of the bug. With the above
reproduction rate, we can only say the problem is fixed after drmtip_270.
However, I would rather prefer we stop looking at the reproduction rate and
instead look at what the bug is: a general protection fault in our driver!
(In reply to Jani Saarinen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=109084#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> ICL systems were updated (BIOS/FW's) during ww10 so might be reason why
> issues are not seen anymore?</span >
No matter what the HW / BIOS is doing, we should not hit a general protection
fault.
So, please investigate.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>