<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-blt - incomplete - Jenkins killed the machine when it shouldn't"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110246#c20">Comment # 20</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-blt - incomplete - Jenkins killed the machine when it shouldn't"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110246">bug 110246</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Lakshmi from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=110246#c19">comment #19</a>)
<span class="quote">> This is a CI issue like how we run the tests. Random tests are failed as
> incompletes.
> The impact of this bug is that we don't test results from the incompletes.
> We can not know the user impact at the moment unless the bug is fixed, e.g
> we can't catch regressions.
>
> All the failures in this bugs are seen only on ICL.</span >
What Lakshmi was trying to say is that we cannot know the health of ICL until
this bug is fixed, because we cannot distinguish if an incomplete comes because
of a platform issue or a CI system issue.
We need to investigate why ICL is behaving so badly compared to the other
shards or RVPs (or maybe we just try too hard compared to other platforms where
we just ignore all incompletes), and experiment with potential fixes.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>