<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck - dmesg-fail - igt_atomic_reset_engine timed out, cancelling test."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110429#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck - dmesg-fail - igt_atomic_reset_engine timed out, cancelling test."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110429">bug 110429</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Arek Hiler from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=110429#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Francesco Balestrieri from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=110429#c2">comment #2</a>)
> > From:
> >
> > <3> [2204.524458] [drm:gen8_reset_engines [i915]] *ERROR* rcs0: reset
> > request timeout
> >
> > It seems that the HW failed to respond and the test timed out. We should
> > increase the timeout of the test to get the actual failure.
>
> Was there anything done already? Did we increase the timeout? The issue was
> seen only once in CI_DRM_5922.</span >
The error has occurred quite rarely across the reset tests over the years, and
over the years we have applied whatever w/a we could find to reduce the rate of
incidence. We haven't increased the timeout applied to the selftest yet -- and
it would not fix the bug, just make the cause more obvious.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>