<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [Intel GFX CI] spec@glsl-1.50@execution@texelfetchoffset@gs-sampler2drect - fail" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110685#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [Intel GFX CI] spec@glsl-1.50@execution@texelfetchoffset@gs-sampler2drect - fail" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110685">bug 110685</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> Martin Peres</a> <pre>(In reply to Denis from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=110685#c4">comment #4</a>) > could you please correct me if I am wrong. > As I see from the web interface, > > ><a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6085/pig-snb-2600/runtimes0.log">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6085/pig-snb-2600/runtimes0.log</a> > > CI_DRM_6085 - this is build number? CI_DRM is indeed the build ID for Linux, but it is also used as an ID for the type of run (post-merge testing of a kernel change, with the latest IGT that was previously tested). > > I can see that in CI_DRM_6086 and at least Ci_DRM_6087 this test passes > successfully: > > 0.12 <a href="mailto:spec@glsl-1.50">spec@glsl-1.50</a>@execution@texelfetchoffset@gs-sampler2drect pass > Does this mean that issue was fixed or could be flaky? Fixed, for sure not: We do not update mesa nor piglit. Well, it could still be an issue introduced by the kernel and then fixed immediately, but I doubt it very much as developers usually don't look at mesa failures except during pre-merge testing. So yeah, it seems like it is a flaky test, with a very low reproduction rate... > > Also, could you please explain, why for these tests was used "mesa is: > 18.2.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.2"?? I checked ubuntu 18.04 repository and found out > that it already has 19.0.2 (<a href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+source/mesa">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+source/mesa</a>) I guess we have not updated yet these machines. I SSHed into it and it was indeed using this old version of mesa (would be nice for piglit to store the mesa version when using the gbm platform, it would save me time :D). > > Thank you in advance for further clarifications. Thanks you for checking it out! The kernel's CI is very bug-centric, so every failure needs to be documented in a bug, so as to provide a forum of discussion about it and try to understand the possible impact of it (which depends a lot on the reproduction rate). This is why you see from time to time bugs from me :)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>