<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] Igt@* - dmesg-warn - WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110913#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] Igt@* - dmesg-warn - WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110913">bug 110913</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jani.nikula@intel.com" title="Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>"> Jani Nikula</a> <pre>IRC discussion on this: 16:12 j4ni ickle: so 33df8a7697a0 ("drm/i915: Prevent lock-cycles between GPU waits and GPU resets") adds extra lockdep annotation, which uncovers an actual existing bug? 16:12 ickle yes 16:12 j4ni and in that sense, the lockdep splat is expected 16:12 ickle it's a valid but unlikely warning 16:16 j4ni looking at <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] Igt@* - dmesg-warn - WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected" href="show_bug.cgi?id=110913">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110913</a> and a random sample of the referenced logs, I can't find a lockdep splat that does *not* contain "i915.reset" 16:17 j4ni i.e. where are the other bugs? 16:18 ickle danvet is worried that CI might be misattributing bugs in pre-merge 16:18 j4ni right, so that hasn't actually happened yet 16:19 j4ni but alas it's bound to happen We need to adjust the CI Bug Log filter to not conflate all lockdep warnings into one, and instead identify just the new warning added by the commit referenced above.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>