<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CHV] Backlight init fails on Surface 3 if module load order is wrong"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96571#c67">Comment # 67</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CHV] Backlight init fails on Surface 3 if module load order is wrong"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96571">bug 96571</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jani.nikula@intel.com" title="Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Jani Nikula</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to youling257 from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=96571#c61">comment #61</a>)
<span class="quote">> CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_CORE=y
> CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y
> CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_SLAVE=y
> CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PCI=y
> CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL=y
> CONFIG_PWM=y
> CONFIG_PWM_SYSFS=y
> CONFIG_PWM_CRC=y
> CONFIG_PWM_LPSS=y
> CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PCI=y
> CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PLATFORM=y
>
> [drm:pwm_setup_backlight [i915]] *ERROR* Failed to own the pwm chip
> I see this problem happen again with Linux 5.3rc1 kernel on my BayTrail
> z3735f device! can't adjust brightness.
>
> Linux 5.3, what reason?</span >
So it looks like this comment hijacked the bug about something completely
different, and now we have a patch en route upstream claiming it fixes this
bug, while in truth the original LPSS issues is not fixed. :(</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>