<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CHV] Backlight init fails on Surface 3 if module load order is wrong" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96571#c69">Comment # 69</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CHV] Backlight init fails on Surface 3 if module load order is wrong" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96571">bug 96571</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.org" title="Hans de Goede <jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.org>"> Hans de Goede</a> <pre>Jani, In hindsight I should have put the link to this bugzilla in that patch as: Related: <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CHV] Backlight init fails on Surface 3 if module load order is wrong" href="show_bug.cgi?id=96571">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96571</a> And not as: BugLink: <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CHV] Backlight init fails on Surface 3 if module load order is wrong" href="show_bug.cgi?id=96571">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96571</a> Sorry. As for this bug, as I tried to explain in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=96571#c63">comment 63</a>, this has been (mostly) fixed for close to 2 years now, at least for configs which build the i915 driver as a module, as almost all generic distro kernels do. So with my Fedora distro contributor had on I consider this bug fixed. If you want to keep it open to track the i915 builtin case, I suggest changing the summary too: BYT/CHT: pwm vs i915 driver initialization order when i915 is builtin To reflect that: 1) This is a generic BYT/CHT issue, not Surface 3 specific 2) This only is a problem when the i915 driver is builtin</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>