<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [icl rps][CI] [DRMTIP] igt@pm_rps@* - fail - Test assertion failure function waitboost - post_freqs[CUR] < post_freqs[MAX]" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108059#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - [icl rps][CI] [DRMTIP] igt@pm_rps@* - fail - Test assertion failure function waitboost - post_freqs[CUR] < post_freqs[MAX]" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108059">bug 108059</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>It's certainly not the same bug and it misbehaved on a few machines, then corrected itself again. It's a relatively noisy test that I am not too worried about -- there are a lot of scheduling factors at play with it being a worker, so long as the debugfs show that we were setting the right flags, I can be responsibly reassured. Doesn't speak well of the boost from a QoS pov though.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>