<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_exec_parallel@(bcs0-)?contexts - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0, error: -28 != 0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111469#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_exec_parallel@(bcs0-)?contexts - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0, error: -28 != 0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111469">bug 111469</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>1f7fd484fff1 drm/i915: Replace i915_vma_put_fence()
b7d151ba4b29 drm/i915: Pull obj->userfault tracking under the ggtt->mutex
e2ccc50a3a6c drm/i915: Track ggtt fence reservations under its own mutex
which are indeed related to GGTT management (and so the reported ENOSPC).
Odd. I would have thought
6846895fde05 ("drm/i915: Replace PIN_NONFAULT with calls to PIN_NOEVICT")
more likely, as that does directly change the eviction algorithm. At least it
sounds like a promising direction.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>