<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Brightness control inversion from VBT table is not taken into account in Ubuntu 18.10"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111475#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Brightness control inversion from VBT table is not taken into account in Ubuntu 18.10"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111475">bug 111475</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:szymon.balcerak@ts.fujitsu.com" title="Szymon <szymon.balcerak@ts.fujitsu.com>"> <span class="fn">Szymon</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Today I performed another tests a here are the results:
1. Confirmed that Linux does not take VBT backlight active low bit into
consideration. If this is the bug that is to be decided by Linux graphic driver
developers. NOTE: Windows graphic driver takes this setting into consideration.
2. Once BIOS writes 0xC8250 MMIO register with bit 29, backlight logic is
inverted correctly. However 10% minimum brightness level defined in VBT table
is NOT taken into account in this case, i.e. Linux brightness slider set at
maximum produces complete darkness instead of 10% brightness (as set as
minimum).
3. In comparison to point 2: Once backlight logic is inverted by kernel boot
parameter acpi_backlight=vendor i915.invert_brightness=1, slider at max still
respects minimum brightness level 10% defined in VBT.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>