<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - 3% perf drop in GfxBench Manhattan 3.0, 3.1 and CarChase test-cases"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111090#c18">Comment # 18</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - 3% perf drop in GfxBench Manhattan 3.0, 3.1 and CarChase test-cases"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111090">bug 111090</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:eero.t.tamminen@intel.com" title="Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Eero Tamminen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Kernel has halved Manhattan 3.0 & 3.1 offscreen versions regression to half on
J4205 between mid July and August (a period from which I didn't get data due to
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [BXT] Everything using GPU gets stuck after running+killing parallel Media loads"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=110848">bug 110848</a>).
I think rest of the regression is too small and too hard to track down => I'm
fine with WONTFIXing this
(There are much more serious bugs, like the GPU hang regressions.)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>