<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - I7-8700 onboard HDMI port does not support 4K resolution"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112018#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - I7-8700 onboard HDMI port does not support 4K resolution"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112018">bug 112018</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" title="Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Ville Syrjala</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to jian-hong from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=112018#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> > Also please attach a dump of
> > /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_vbt
>
> The dump is as the attachment.</span >
Sadly I don't see anything obvious we could use as a hint to ignore the dual
mode adapter's limit. I was hoping the VBT would declare the port as an
internal HDMI port (which it does) *and* it would declare a TMDS clock limit
<span class="quote">>165MHz (which sadly it does not) :(</span >
Well, it does say the limit is 0 ie. "platform max" but that's not a very
strong hint to indicate that someone actually tested the thing with a >165MHz
clock. Could be just they were too lazy to put in any real number and so left
it at 0. So I'm not keen on including that as a valid value in such a
heuristic. Feels like that could backfire on us.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>