<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@kms_psr@psr2_* - fail - Failed assertion: psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(data)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109454#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@kms_psr@psr2_* - fail - Failed assertion: psr_wait_entry_if_enabled(data)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109454">bug 109454</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jose.souza@intel.com" title="Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>"> Jose Roberto de Souza</a> <pre>(In reply to Matt Roper from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=109454#c7">comment #7</a>) > All failures attached to this bug are on the fi-whl-u machine and from the > logs it appears the panel on this machine is considered unreliable: > > <7> [264.149232] [drm:intel_dp_compute_config [i915]] PSR sink > implementation is not reliable > > which causes the driver to force PSR support off. IGT is just looking for > the string "Sink support: yes [0x03]" in debugfs to know whether a panel > support PSR2 or not, but maybe we should also expose the unreliable panel > flag through debugfs too and have IGT also confirm that that flag is not set > before attempting the test? Yeah I think is time to have something like this, thanks Matt.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>