<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][RESUME]igt@gem_persistent_relocs@interruptible - timeout - Code: Bad RIP value."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][RESUME]igt@gem_persistent_relocs@interruptible - timeout - Code: Bad RIP value."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271">bug 112271</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Nothing too suspicious, looks to be a normal timeout for a slow test.
I think we can do better in igt_runner to distinguish between suspicious
timeouts and boring ones. Obviously, we can push the taint check earlier so any
BUG_ON is immediately failed. Then we can check how it is responding to the
signals, i.e. if it cleans up immediately on SIGQUIT, it's just a regular
timeout. But if some processes are still stuck after SIGKILL, we have a
deadlock on our hands.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>