[PATCH 0/7] Revert vblank related patches to find regression

StanLis stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com
Mon Jun 11 14:11:21 UTC 2018


From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>

There is a suspicion that some vblank handling related change introduce
a regression in FDO BUG #106087.
Reverted those patches to check with trybot.

Stanislav Lisovskiy (7):
  Revert "drm/i915: Estimate and update missed vblanks."
  Revert "drm/vblank: Restoring vblank counts after device PM events."
  Revert "drm/vblank: Do not update vblank count if interrupts are
    already disabled."
  Revert "drm/atomic: Handle 64-bit return from drm_crtc_vblank_count()"
  Revert "drm/i915: Handle 64-bit return from drm_crtc_vblank_count()"
  Revert "drm/i915/vblank: Make the vblank counter u64 -> u32 typecast
    explicit"
  Revert "drm/vblank: Data type fixes for 64-bit vblank sequences."

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c          |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c         | 91 ++++------------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c  |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c      | 12 ----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  2 +-
 include/drm/drm_atomic.h             |  2 +-
 include/drm/drm_vblank.h             |  4 +-
 8 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.0



More information about the Intel-gfx-trybot mailing list