[PATCH 0/7] Revert vblank related patches to find regression
StanLis
stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com
Mon Jun 11 14:11:21 UTC 2018
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
There is a suspicion that some vblank handling related change introduce
a regression in FDO BUG #106087.
Reverted those patches to check with trybot.
Stanislav Lisovskiy (7):
Revert "drm/i915: Estimate and update missed vblanks."
Revert "drm/vblank: Restoring vblank counts after device PM events."
Revert "drm/vblank: Do not update vblank count if interrupts are
already disabled."
Revert "drm/atomic: Handle 64-bit return from drm_crtc_vblank_count()"
Revert "drm/i915: Handle 64-bit return from drm_crtc_vblank_count()"
Revert "drm/i915/vblank: Make the vblank counter u64 -> u32 typecast
explicit"
Revert "drm/vblank: Data type fixes for 64-bit vblank sequences."
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 91 ++++------------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 12 ----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
include/drm/drm_atomic.h | 2 +-
include/drm/drm_vblank.h | 4 +-
8 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
--
2.17.0
More information about the Intel-gfx-trybot
mailing list