[PATCH 18/28] drm/i915/dg1: Compute MEM Bandwidth using MCHBAR
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Tue Apr 20 15:46:31 UTC 2021
From: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor at intel.com>
The PUNIT FW is currently returning 0 for all memory bandwidth
parameters. Read the values directly from MCHBAR offsets 0x5918 and
0x4000(4). This is a temporary WA until the PUNIT FW returns valid
values.
v2 (Lucas): Add error to log since this is fixed in new pcode available
on IFWI WW14. Also fix checkpatch warnings.
v3 by Jani:
- switch to intel_uncore_read/intel_uncore_write
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
index b079a51d3b99..2167ac263f92 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
@@ -23,6 +23,53 @@ struct intel_qgv_info {
u8 t_bl;
};
+#define SA_PERF_STATUS_0_0_0_MCHBAR_PC _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5918)
+#define DG1_QCLK_RATIO_MASK (0xFF << 2)
+#define DG1_QCLK_RATIO_SHIFT 2
+#define DG1_QCLK_REFERENCE (1 << 10)
+
+#define MCHBAR_CH0_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x4000)
+#define MCHBAR_CH0_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR_HIGH _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x4004)
+#define MCHBAR_CH1_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x4400)
+#define MCHBAR_CH1_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR_HIGH _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x4404)
+#define DG1_DRAM_T_RCD_MASK (0x7F << 9)
+#define DG1_DRAM_T_RCD_SHIFT 9
+#define DG1_DRAM_T_RDPRE_MASK (0x3F << 11)
+#define DG1_DRAM_T_RDPRE_SHIFT 11
+#define DG1_DRAM_T_RAS_MASK (0xFF << 1)
+#define DG1_DRAM_T_RAS_SHIFT 1
+#define DG1_DRAM_T_RP_MASK (0x7F << 0)
+#define DG1_DRAM_T_RP_SHIFT 0
+
+static int dg1_mchbar_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ struct intel_qgv_point *sp,
+ int point)
+{
+ u32 val = 0;
+ u32 dclk_ratio = 0, dclk_reference = 0;
+
+ val = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, SA_PERF_STATUS_0_0_0_MCHBAR_PC);
+ dclk_ratio = (val & DG1_QCLK_RATIO_MASK) >> DG1_QCLK_RATIO_SHIFT;
+ if (val & DG1_QCLK_REFERENCE)
+ dclk_reference = 6; /* 6 * 16.666 MHz = 100 MHz */
+ else
+ dclk_reference = 8; /* 8 * 16.666 MHz = 133 MHz */
+ sp->dclk = dclk_ratio * dclk_reference;
+ if (sp->dclk == 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ val = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, MCHBAR_CH0_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR);
+ sp->t_rp = (val & DG1_DRAM_T_RP_MASK) >> DG1_DRAM_T_RP_SHIFT;
+ sp->t_rdpre = (val & DG1_DRAM_T_RDPRE_MASK) >> DG1_DRAM_T_RDPRE_SHIFT;
+
+ val = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, MCHBAR_CH0_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR_HIGH);
+ sp->t_rcd = (val & DG1_DRAM_T_RCD_MASK) >> DG1_DRAM_T_RCD_SHIFT;
+ sp->t_ras = (val & DG1_DRAM_T_RAS_MASK) >> DG1_DRAM_T_RAS_SHIFT;
+
+ sp->t_rc = sp->t_rp + sp->t_ras;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
struct intel_qgv_point *sp,
int point)
@@ -100,7 +147,12 @@ static int icl_get_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
struct intel_qgv_point *sp = &qi->points[i];
ret = icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(dev_priv, sp, i);
- if (ret)
+ if (IS_DG1(dev_priv) && (ret || sp->dclk == 0)) {
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Failed to get memory subsystem information via pcode. IFWI needs update. Trying with MCHBAR\n");
+ ret = dg1_mchbar_read_qgv_point_info(dev_priv, sp, i);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ } else if (ret)
return ret;
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
--
2.26.3
More information about the Intel-gfx-trybot
mailing list