[PATCH i-g-t 02/10] tests/gem_exec_big: Skip relocation part
Zbigniew Kempczyński
zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com
Thu Aug 12 12:30:15 UTC 2021
When running on platforms without relocation support, verification
of their correctness should be skipped. What remains is exercising
submission of large batches.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Turko <andrzej.turko at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
---
tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c
index 1f8c720b6..90230fc33 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_big.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Run a large nop batch to stress test the error capture"
#define FORCE_PREAD_PWRITE 0
static int use_64bit_relocs;
+static bool has_relocs;
static void exec1(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t reloc_ofs, unsigned flags, char *ptr)
{
@@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ static void exec1(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t reloc_ofs, unsigned flags, c
gem_reloc[0].presumed_offset = 0;
gem_exec[0].handle = handle;
- gem_exec[0].relocation_count = 1;
+ gem_exec[0].relocation_count = has_relocs ? 1 : 0;
gem_exec[0].relocs_ptr = to_user_pointer(gem_reloc);
gem_exec[0].alignment = 0;
gem_exec[0].offset = 0;
@@ -100,6 +101,9 @@ static void exec1(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t reloc_ofs, unsigned flags, c
igt_warn_on(gem_reloc[0].presumed_offset == -1);
gem_set_domain(fd, gem_exec[0].handle, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_WC, 0);
+ if (!has_relocs)
+ return;
+
if (use_64bit_relocs) {
uint64_t tmp;
if (ptr)
@@ -134,11 +138,13 @@ static void execN(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t batch_size, unsigned flags,
#define reloc_ofs(N, T) ((((N)+1) << 12) - 4*(1 + ((N) == ((T)-1))))
struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 gem_exec[1];
- struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *gem_reloc;
- uint64_t n, nreloc = batch_size >> 12;
+ struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *gem_reloc = NULL;
+ uint64_t n, nreloc = has_relocs ? batch_size >> 12 : 0;
- gem_reloc = calloc(nreloc, sizeof(*gem_reloc));
- igt_assert(gem_reloc);
+ if (has_relocs) {
+ gem_reloc = calloc(nreloc, sizeof(*gem_reloc));
+ igt_assert(gem_reloc);
+ }
for (n = 0; n < nreloc; n++) {
gem_reloc[n].offset = reloc_ofs(n, nreloc);
@@ -173,6 +179,10 @@ static void execN(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t batch_size, unsigned flags,
igt_permute_array(gem_reloc, nreloc, xchg_reloc);
gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf);
+
+ if (!has_relocs)
+ return;
+
for (n = 0; n < nreloc; n++) {
if (igt_warn_on(gem_reloc[n].presumed_offset == -1))
break;
@@ -305,6 +315,7 @@ igt_main
igt_require_gem(i915);
use_64bit_relocs = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(i915)) >= 8;
+ has_relocs = gem_has_relocations(i915);
}
igt_subtest("single")
--
2.26.0
More information about the Intel-gfx-trybot
mailing list