[PATCH 4/4] diff
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Thu Sep 1 12:49:33 UTC 2022
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 21 ++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
index a81063e5aa93..052fa96d459e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
@@ -1000,7 +1000,26 @@ static vm_fault_t vm_fault_ttm(struct vm_fault *vmf)
return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
}
- if (!i915_ttm_resource_mappable(bo->resource)) {
+ /*
+ * This must be swapped out with shmem ttm_tt (pipeline-gutting).
+ * Calling ttm_bo_validate() here with TTM_PL_SYSTEM should only go as
+ * far as far doing a ttm_bo_move_null(), which should skip all the
+ * other junk.
+ */
+ if (!bo->resource) {
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {
+ .interruptible = true,
+ .no_wait_gpu = true, /* should be idle already */
+ };
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!bo->ttm || !(bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED));
+
+ ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, i915_ttm_sys_placement(), &ctx);
+ if (ret) {
+ dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
+ return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
+ }
+ } else if (!i915_ttm_resource_mappable(bo->resource)) {
int err = -ENODEV;
int i;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
index c420d1ab605b..1bca67cfb0fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
@@ -103,7 +103,27 @@ void i915_ttm_adjust_gem_after_move(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
unsigned int cache_level;
+ unsigned int mem_flags;
unsigned int i;
+ int mem_type;
+
+ /*
+ * We might have been purged (or swapped out) if the resource is NULL,
+ * in which case the SYSTEM placement is the closest match to describe
+ * the current domain. If the object is ever used in this state then we
+ * will require moving it again.
+ */
+ if (!bo->resource) {
+ mem_flags = I915_BO_FLAG_STRUCT_PAGE;
+ mem_type = I915_PL_SYSTEM;
+ cache_level = I915_CACHE_NONE;
+ } else {
+ mem_flags = i915_ttm_cpu_maps_iomem(bo->resource) ? I915_BO_FLAG_IOMEM :
+ I915_BO_FLAG_STRUCT_PAGE;
+ mem_type = bo->resource->mem_type;
+ cache_level = i915_ttm_cache_level(to_i915(bo->base.dev), bo->resource,
+ bo->ttm);
+ }
/*
* If object was moved to an allowable region, update the object
@@ -111,11 +131,11 @@ void i915_ttm_adjust_gem_after_move(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
* in an allowable region, it's evicted and we don't update the
* object region.
*/
- if (intel_region_to_ttm_type(obj->mm.region) != bo->resource->mem_type) {
+ if (intel_region_to_ttm_type(obj->mm.region) != mem_type) {
for (i = 0; i < obj->mm.n_placements; ++i) {
struct intel_memory_region *mr = obj->mm.placements[i];
- if (intel_region_to_ttm_type(mr) == bo->resource->mem_type &&
+ if (intel_region_to_ttm_type(mr) == mem_type &&
mr != obj->mm.region) {
i915_gem_object_release_memory_region(obj);
i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(obj, mr);
@@ -125,12 +145,8 @@ void i915_ttm_adjust_gem_after_move(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
}
obj->mem_flags &= ~(I915_BO_FLAG_STRUCT_PAGE | I915_BO_FLAG_IOMEM);
+ obj->mem_flags |= mem_flags;
- obj->mem_flags |= i915_ttm_cpu_maps_iomem(bo->resource) ? I915_BO_FLAG_IOMEM :
- I915_BO_FLAG_STRUCT_PAGE;
-
- cache_level = i915_ttm_cache_level(to_i915(bo->base.dev), bo->resource,
- bo->ttm);
i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, cache_level);
}
@@ -560,7 +576,33 @@ int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
bool clear;
int ret;
- if (GEM_WARN_ON(!obj) || !bo->resource) {
+ if (!bo->resource) {
+ if (GEM_WARN_ON(!obj)) {
+ ttm_bo_move_null(bo, dst_mem);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (dst_mem->mem_type != TTM_PL_SYSTEM) {
+ hop->mem_type = TTM_PL_SYSTEM;
+ hop->flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY;
+ return -EMULTIHOP;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This is only reached when first creating the object, or if
+ * the object was purged or swapped out (pipeline-gutting). For
+ * the former we can safely skip all of the below since we are
+ * only using a dummy SYSTEM placement here. And with the latter
+ * we will always re-enter here with bo->resource set correctly
+ * (as per the above), since this is part of a multi-hop
+ * sequence, where at the end we can do the move for real.
+ *
+ * The special case here is when the dst_mem is TTM_PL_SYSTEM,
+ * which doens't require any kind of move, so it should be safe
+ * to skip all the below and call ttm_bo_move_null() here, where
+ * the caller in __i915_ttm_get_pages() will take care of the
+ * rest, since we should have a valid ttm_tt.
+ */
ttm_bo_move_null(bo, dst_mem);
return 0;
}
--
2.37.2
More information about the Intel-gfx-trybot
mailing list