[Intel-gfx] gem driver
keithp at keithp.com
Wed Aug 13 03:46:35 CEST 2008
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:50 +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> I saw this comment in your patch regarding GTT restoration on resume.
> > I noticed this once I started relying on persistent GTT mappings across VT
> > switch in our GEM work -- the old X server and DRM code carefully unbind
> > all memory from the GTT on VT switch, but GEM does not bother.
> does this mean that it is now impossible to run several instances of X server?
We're getting closer, but DRM is still single-master, which means only
one X server. KMS and DRI2 both change how things work in this area, but
I believe there are few more DRM/X interactions which need fixing.
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Intel-gfx