[Intel-gfx] x11perf -aa10text performance

[Lukas Hejtmanek]

On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:11:02AM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> > Yes, the original patch as posted was buggy.
> > 
> > I've now pushed an improved version out to the master branch that should
> > not have this bug.
> > 
> > Any feedback on that would be most welcome.

Well, with UXA I can get 215000 glyphs/sec *without* the glyph cache in the
Xserver. With EXA I got only 66000 glyphs/sec. Is there something terribly
broken in Intel's EXA code or Xserver's EXA? I use Xserver 1.5.3 (from
Ubuntu). I run both UXA and EXA on the same Xserver.

-- 
Lukáš Hejtmánek