[Intel-gfx] x11perf -aa10text performance

[Carl Worth]

On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 10:48 +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:18:11AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: 
> > server 1.5.2 doesn't have the glyph cache, due to radeon optimization
> > brokenness in EXA.  Server 1.6 certainly will.
> 
> on the other hand, even without the glyph cache, it should do better job.
> 
> at least based on Carl's blog:
> http://cworth.org/blog/ 
> 
> let's say 140k glyphs/sec or even 208k g/s.

Hi Lukas,

The numbers I reported there were with an X server from the master
branch, so it does have the glyph cache. And I would expect that to help
a lot.

Meanwhile, what graphics device do you have? The numbers I've been
reporting are for the 965, and things on the 945 are about twice as fast
right now. So there can be some significant differences between
different devices.

-Carl

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20081114/d9820af6/attachment.sig>