[Intel-gfx] x11perf -aa10text performance
Lukas Hejtmanek
xhejtman at ics.muni.cz
Mon Nov 17 14:30:54 CET 2008
Carl,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 02:35:08PM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> > Meanwhile, what graphics device do you have? The numbers I've been
> > reporting are for the 965, and things on the 945 are about twice as fast
> > right now. So there can be some significant differences between
> > different devices.
>
> I have 965GM card.
I found some older x11perf output on my i965GM.
The performance was:
560000 reps @ 0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
560000 reps @ 0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
560000 reps @ 0.0097 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
560000 reps @ 0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
560000 reps @ 0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
2800000 trep @ 0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
Now it is:
320000 reps @ 0.0168 msec ( 59600.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
320000 reps @ 0.0168 msec ( 59700.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
320000 reps @ 0.0168 msec ( 59400.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
320000 reps @ 0.0170 msec ( 58800.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
320000 reps @ 0.0169 msec ( 59100.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
1600000 trep @ 0.0169 msec ( 59300.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list