[Intel-gfx] x11perf -aa10text performance

Lukas Hejtmanek xhejtman at ics.muni.cz
Mon Nov 17 14:30:54 CET 2008


Carl,

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 02:35:08PM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> > Meanwhile, what graphics device do you have? The numbers I've been
> > reporting are for the 965, and things on the 945 are about twice as fast
> > right now. So there can be some significant differences between
> > different devices.
> 
> I have 965GM card.

I found some older x11perf output on my i965GM. 

The performance was:
 560000 reps @   0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
 560000 reps @   0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
 560000 reps @   0.0097 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
 560000 reps @   0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
 560000 reps @   0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
2800000 trep @   0.0096 msec (104000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)


Now it is:
 320000 reps @   0.0168 msec ( 59600.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
 320000 reps @   0.0168 msec ( 59700.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
 320000 reps @   0.0168 msec ( 59400.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
 320000 reps @   0.0170 msec ( 58800.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
 320000 reps @   0.0169 msec ( 59100.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)
1600000 trep @   0.0169 msec ( 59300.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10)


-- 
Lukáš Hejtmánek



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list