[Intel-gfx] Howto enable i830FALLBACK, regressions with xorg/intel from git.
Clemens Eisserer
linuxhippy at gmail.com
Thu Oct 9 13:12:44 CEST 2008
Hi,
> In i830.h, enable I830DEBUG define will enable FALLBACK debug info.
Thanks a lot, good to know.
I wrote a simple test-case which I use as benchmark when executed in a
loop, the test basically only does fillrect(s) and composition.
With intel-2.1.1 on an 945GM I get the following profile:
116144 51.1772 no-vmlinux no-vmlinux (no symbols)
58445 25.7529 intel_drv.so intel_drv.so (no symbols)
22990 10.1302 [vdso] (tgid:2135 range:0xb7fc1000-0xb7fc2000) Xorg
(no symbols)
3428 1.5105 libexa.so libexa.so
ExaOffscreenMarkUsed
However with xserver/intel git on an 945GM I get:
116343 78.2012 libpixman-1.so.0.13.1 libpixman-1.so.0.13.1
fbCompositeSolidMask_nx8x8888mmx
8811 5.9224 libpixman-1.so.0.13.1 libpixman-1.so.0.13.1
pixman_fill_mmx
6743 4.5324 no-vmlinux no-vmlinux (no symbols)
3767 2.5320 libpixman-1.so.0.13.1 libpixman-1.so.0.13.1 pixman_fill
So it seems this simple test is rendered software-only, however I
don't get any fallback-messages.
I also saw this behaviour with some other tests I did, so it seems
not specific to that workload.
Could there be configuration issues which prevents the intel driver to
not allocate pixmaps in vram?
I uploaded the debug-output of the program running to:
http://pastebin.com/m719bb53a
The "benchmark" itself to: http://pastebin.com/f6030e18a
And Xorg.log to: http://pastebin.com/m2a59a061
Thanks, Clemens
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list