[Intel-gfx] Legacy backlight control with KMS and BACKLIGHT property
Greg KH
greg at kroah.com
Fri Aug 14 20:13:28 CEST 2009
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:56:39AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:54:05 +0200
> Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de> wrote:
>
> > Currently with KMS legacy backlight control isn't working at all.
> > Also, the driver doesn't expose the BACKLIGHT RandR property in any
> > case, so xbacklight doesn't work with KMS.
> >
> > I've been working on a patch as a quick-hack for this (attached;
> > please DON'T apply), and am finally understanding enough to actually
> > implement this correctly together with GregKH.
> >
> >
> > What we're supposing is
> >
> > - a kernel driver for the /sys/class/backlight/ api for the legacy
> > method
> > - support in the driver to actually open this one (trivial)
> > - support for the BACKLIGHT property in KMS case, *only* using the
> > kernel api method for now (will need some abstraction)
>
> This sounds like the correct approach. We have an RFE open on this too:
> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20963
My question is, does this belong in the kernel side, to expose the
backlight through /sys/class/backlight/, or do we do this on the
userspace side in perhaps the xorg intel driver (where we can touch
pci config space just as easily)?
What does KMS expect to have happen?
thanks,
greg k-h
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list