[Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.9.99.902

[Tino Keitel]

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 13:37:19 -0500, Robert Hooker wrote:

[...]

> adjust the libdrm build to not remove the headers as well as have it
> replace linux-libc-dev.

Replacing linux-libc-dev with libdrm-dev sounds like a bad idea to me. 
The package linux-libc-dev contains a lot more than just DRM header
files, so I guess that a lot of header files would be missing if I
remove the linux-libc-dev package.

Regards,
Tino