[Intel-gfx] Updated patch series for removing EXA

Eric Anholt eric at anholt.net
Wed Feb 25 19:12:58 CET 2009

On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 09:09 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 22:42 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > If people like the looks of this, I'm thinking of pushing all but the last
> > patch pretty soon.
> I've reviewed the patch series in some detail and it looks good to me.
> How much of the last patch can we merge so that the 'remove EXA' patch
> only affects #ifdef USE_EXA code?

I'll try to split it out.

Also, the last patch I added to not do DRI2 if !GEM ended up not working
out because memory_manager wasn't set by that point.  Our initialization
path is too complicated.

Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net                         eric.anholt at intel.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20090225/057ee2be/attachment.sig>

More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list