[Intel-gfx] Trying to update Intel driver to get pbuffer support with GM45 on Fedora 11 x86_64

[Avedissian, Vahe Y (AS)]

Hi Ian,

Thank you again for the clarification. I understand.

One final question, for off-screen rendering support, are framebuffer
objects the way to go then? And does
That work with the current driver release? I am just trying to figure
out if we approaching
Our SW development the wrong way or what...
Vahe
 

-----Original Message-----
From: intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Ian
Romanick
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:38 AM
To: Avedissian, Vahe Y (AS)
Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Julien Cristau
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Trying to update Intel driver to get pbuffer
support with GM45 on Fedora 11 x86_64

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Avedissian, Vahe Y (AS) wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. Do you know if that is coming (an 
> upgrade to glx 1.3 or 1.4) and if so, What version of the Intel 
> graphics and what estimated timeframe?

Like I said before, we don't have any intention of *ever* supporting
pbuffers.  We will finish up the few bits of missing code (that Kristian
mentioned) so that we can advertise GLX 1.4, but there won't be any
fbconfigs with GLX_PBUFFER_BIT set.  There are only so many hours in the
day, and we have tons of work to do that we believe has higher priority.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpfV28ACgkQX1gOwKyEAw/vKgCdHotJqrukIaXchtQEGjpuBwGz
nuoAn2W7Cj2++tcf/CwQf2zOuuQo8jRU
=umhU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx