[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: downclock support

[Keith Packard]

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 17:55 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

>  static int intel_crtc_cursor_move(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> @@ -2557,6 +2661,12 @@ static int intel_crtc_cursor_move(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y)
>  	uint32_t temp = 0;
>  	uint32_t adder;
>  
> +	if (!intel_crtc->busy)
> +		intel_increase_pllclock(crtc, true);
> +	intel_crtc->busy = true;
> +	mod_timer(&intel_crtc->idle_timer, jiffies +
> +		  msecs_to_jiffies(CRTC_IDLE_TIMEOUT));
> +
>  	if (x < 0) {
>  		temp |= CURSOR_POS_SIGN << CURSOR_X_SHIFT;
>  		x = -x;

> +void intel_mark_busy(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_gem_object *obj)

> +		if (intel_fb->obj == obj) {
> +			if (!intel_crtc->busy)
> +				intel_increase_pllclock(crtc, true);
> +			intel_crtc->busy = true;
> +			mod_timer(&intel_crtc->idle_timer, jiffies +
> +				  msecs_to_jiffies(CRTC_IDLE_TIMEOUT));
> +		}

Merge these two pieces of identical code?

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20090727/71d2cccb/attachment.sig>