[Intel-gfx] Proposal for rules for maintaining the 2.7 branch

[Zhenyu Wang]

On 2009.03.20 02:13:10 +0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:28 +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> > 'Twas brillig, and Carl Worth at 11/03/09 23:04 did gyre and gimble:
> > > Not cherry-picked (not obviously a bug fix):
> > > 
> > > 	commit 73db44e7ac524e84e5f0fda2d60069a9e954ad1b
> > > 	Author: Kristian Høgsberg <krh at redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > 	    Drop Legacy3D option, only use fixed texture space with non-gem.
> > 
> > Ironically, this one may indeed be a bug fix that /should/ be 
> > cherry-picked ;)
> 
> Heh. Thanks for the note. I've cherry-picked this and pushed out several
> other fixes on the 2.7 branch.
> 
> It seems that authors are nicely marking most fixes explicitly as fixes.
> Thanks so much!
> 
> We're down to just for high-priority bugs left on our bug tracker[*],
> (and I think Eric says he's got one of his fixed already). Thanks to
> everyone working to ensure that 2.7 will be an excellent release.
> 

My concern for 2.7 branch is my LVDS config detect from VBT patch.
I'm still waiting for official VBIOS info on the version this can be
really used. http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20752

I've added it into 2.7 blocker list.

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20090320/53313495/attachment.sig>