[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drmmode overlay support v3
eric at anholt.net
Sun Oct 4 20:55:47 CEST 2009
On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 14:23 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 02:38:46PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 22:57 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > OK, I've finally pulled this for -next, with a bit of hand resolving of
> > conflicts. I debated, because of the somewhat unusual series of adding
> > the ring sync, implementing, fixing the ring sync use, then removing
> > ring sync. Often, that sort of stuff gets flattened out in the commit
> > history. However, in this case I think it's OK as overlays are touchy
> > and bisectability for "is the interruptible stuff working correctly" may
> > prove useful.
> I've actually flattened all previous iterations. But when I was tackling
> the non-interruptible sleeps, suddenly all my testers went awol. So I'd
> like to merge a somewhat tested base version for easier debugging.
> > Then I noticed that you'd told me that there was newer stuff in your
> > gitorious tree. Only, that stuff claims to be older (v3), and doesn't
> > have some of the patches above. So I've pushed my merge to drm-overlay
> > of my tree for review -- is it what you think should land?
> I've actually rebased everything locally but then screwed up by pushing
> the wrong branch. Sorry for the mess and your duplicate effort. As
> mentioned on irc there's just a tiny fix missing. I'll follow up with a
> patch against drm-tree when I've finished stress-testing it on my box.
> Thanks, Daniel
I'm quite happy to just pull a tree (it's easier than patch application,
and we've done a lot of review on this series already), so feel free to
put up what you've tested and I'll grab it.
eric at anholt.net eric.anholt at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Intel-gfx