[Intel-gfx] pipe control notify removed?

[Zhenyu Wang]

On 2010.12.15 10:05:01 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:14:53 +0800, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Chris, just notice you removed pipe control notify entirely on -next,
> > that seems wrong to me. In Ironlake time, we've seen interrupt stall issue
> > with user interrupt, and be warned user interrupt is deprecated, so we moved
> > on to use pipe control notify, although there's a workaround later covered
> > that's required on Ironlake. But it's stable finally. And for sandybridge, 
> > there's no such workaround needed.
> 
> The answer to this is to make sure that such details are kept in the
> code comments, especially if such information is not readily available
> in the documentation.

yeah, also our spec might not have been updated as well...I'll send the BUN
doc for that to you.

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20101216/bb25e5ea/attachment.sig>