[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: no LVDS on Intel SandyBridge SDVs
Keith Packard
keithp at keithp.com
Tue Dec 21 21:12:42 CET 2010
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:55:15 +0000, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> The test we do is simply whether the LVDS i2c pins are addressable. That
> requires differentiating between an IO error and a NAK, which at present
> is only possible using GMBUS. The reference to this method I found in the
> BIOS writers' guide, but of course that doesn't actually explain how it
> works (especially the significance of address 0xa0).
I can't see how that would work without an i2c receiver on the DDC
bus...
But, then, I've been surprised by DDC in the past, so perhaps it's worth
a test on a device that has LVDS but does not have EDID.
--
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20101221/8a4d0ac7/attachment.sig>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list