[Intel-gfx] Incorrect limitation?

[Ian Romanick]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Olivier Galibert wrote:

> I'm interested by accelerating accumulation buffers because I think
> it's a good way to familiarize myself with the code.  Low, localized
> impact.  What I'm really interested with (OpenGL 3.2) is not something
> you _start_ with :-)

There is a list of missing 3.x features on the DRI wiki.  There are a
number of things there that someone new to the code base could tackle.
GL_NV_primitive_restart and GL_ARB_instanced_arrays come to mind.
Gallium has support for GL_ARB_instanced_arrays, but core Mesa does not,
as far as I'm aware.  Finishing out the missing bits of
GL_EXT_texture_snorm shouldn't be too rough either.

	http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/MissingFunctionality
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAktx+DQACgkQX1gOwKyEAw860QCdFLmJ5d62cHpDQysZdKc++WYn
Bu4An1sbZ7I0MaZyNDXMiwu4eO5ApJu1
=IpK/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----