[Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

Carl Worth cworth at cworth.org
Tue Jun 15 18:46:19 CEST 2010


On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:18:17 +0100, Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 17:39:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> 
> > New requirements compared to 2.10
> > ---------------------------------
> >  * Libdrm >= 2.4.19
> > 
> The requirement is actually 2.4.21, afaict.

Can you give more details of what's required in 2.4.21 so that I can
make a commit message that explains it?

I made the bump to require 2.4.19 when I noticed a failure to compile
against 2.4.16 with an unresolved drm_intel_bo_emit_reloc_fence
function. So the commit message I wrote was:

    Fix to require libdrm 2.4.19 or newer.
    
    This is necessary for the drm_intel_bo_emit_reloc_fence function which
    did not exist in 2.4.16 which is all we were requiring earlier.

I'd like something similar to accompany a commit requiring 2.4.21.

-Carl

-- 
carl.d.worth at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20100615/466f1345/attachment.sig>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list