[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] rip out i830_memory, part 2: xvmc
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Thu Mar 4 10:08:50 CET 2010
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:44:25PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> diff --git a/src/i915_hwmc.c b/src/i915_hwmc.c
> index 4395cdc..c0b0bb8 100644
> --- a/src/i915_hwmc.c
> +++ b/src/i915_hwmc.c
> @@ -797,6 +797,7 @@ static int i915_xvmc_put_image(ScrnInfoPtr scrn,
> int ret;
>
> if (FOURCC_XVMC == id) {
> +#if 0
> switch (xvmc_cmd->command) {
> case INTEL_XVMC_COMMAND_DISPLAY:
> if ((xvmc_cmd->srfNo >= I915_XVMC_MAX_SURFACES) ||
> @@ -815,6 +816,9 @@ static int i915_xvmc_put_image(ScrnInfoPtr scrn,
> default:
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
> + /* Pass the GEM object name through the pointer arg. */
> + buf = (void *)(uintptr_t)xvmc_cmd->handle;
> }
>
> ret =
>
> Why are we adding an #if 0 instead of just deleting the code here?
Because I've forgotten to kill it after the code really worked. Please
kill it.
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list