[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix KMS regression on Sandybridge/CPT

[Zhenyu Wang]

On 2010.10.28 10:50:04 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> 
> The POSTING_READs you added are no-ops since they are all followed by a
> read. The transconf should have the bpc in the register at this point or
> else we should have bugged much earlier. The break-exec-wait condition is
> still documented for gen6, augmented with an additional break-sempahore-wait
> and obviously per-ring, but this is unrelated to the changelog.
> 
> I've shrunk the patch to just the FDI portion, pushed to staging for
> review. 

Current drm-intel-staging still fails unfortunately..

> Let's try to keep patches as minimal as possible and addressing
> a single issue. (I'm as guilty of violating that as anyone.) Mostly so
> that we have a clear history of why/how the code works (and I don't break
> it later).

yeah, will do that, thanks for remind.

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20101029/aa83beb4/attachment.sig>