[Intel-gfx] [PATH v2 6/6] Xv: dont call intel_wait_for_scanline on Sandybridge
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Oct 29 10:20:11 CEST 2010
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:42:05 -0700, Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 October 2010 19:17:33 Xiang, Haihao wrote:
> > MI_LOAD_SCAN_LINE_INCL command is not available on sandybridge.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiang, Haihao <haihao.xiang at intel.com>
> > ---
> > src/intel_video.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/intel_video.c b/src/intel_video.c
> > index afc2405..cdff149 100644
> > --- a/src/intel_video.c
> > +++ b/src/intel_video.c
> > @@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ I830PutImageTextured(ScrnInfoPtr scrn,
> > return BadAlloc;
> > }
> >
> > - if (crtc && adaptor_priv->SyncToVblank != 0) {
> > + if (crtc && adaptor_priv->SyncToVblank != 0 && INTEL_INFO(intel)->gen <
> > 60) { intel_wait_for_scanline(scrn, pixmap, crtc, clipBoxes);
> > }
>
> I think you mean < 6 here (not 60)?
No, 60. It's generation*10 + minor revision, just so that g33 and g45
could be easily identified from their gen3 and gen4 brethen.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list