[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/21] drm/i915: Repeat retiring of requests until the seqno is stable
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Apr 16 11:17:41 CEST 2011
The list walking over objects and requests to retire may take a
significant amount of time, enough time for the GPU to have finished
more batches. So repeat the list walking until the GPU seqno is stable.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index b9515ac..58e77d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1952,47 +1952,45 @@ i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
WARN_ON(i915_verify_lists(ring->dev));
- seqno = ring->get_seqno(ring);
+ do {
+ seqno = ring->get_seqno(ring);
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ring->sync_seqno); i++)
- if (seqno >= ring->sync_seqno[i])
- ring->sync_seqno[i] = 0;
+ while (!list_empty(&ring->request_list)) {
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
- while (!list_empty(&ring->request_list)) {
- struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
+ request = list_first_entry(&ring->request_list,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request,
+ list);
- request = list_first_entry(&ring->request_list,
- struct drm_i915_gem_request,
- list);
-
- if (!i915_seqno_passed(seqno, request->seqno))
- break;
+ if (!i915_seqno_passed(seqno, request->seqno))
+ break;
- trace_i915_gem_request_retire(ring, request->seqno);
+ trace_i915_gem_request_retire(ring, request->seqno);
- list_del(&request->list);
- i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(request);
- kfree(request);
- }
+ list_del(&request->list);
+ i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(request);
+ kfree(request);
+ }
- /* Move any buffers on the active list that are no longer referenced
- * by the ringbuffer to the flushing/inactive lists as appropriate.
- */
- while (!list_empty(&ring->active_list)) {
- struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+ /* Move any buffers on the active list that are no longer referenced
+ * by the ringbuffer to the flushing/inactive lists as appropriate.
+ */
+ while (!list_empty(&ring->active_list)) {
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
- obj= list_first_entry(&ring->active_list,
- struct drm_i915_gem_object,
- ring_list);
+ obj = list_first_entry(&ring->active_list,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object,
+ ring_list);
- if (!i915_seqno_passed(seqno, obj->last_rendering_seqno))
- break;
+ if (!i915_seqno_passed(seqno, obj->last_rendering_seqno))
+ break;
- if (obj->base.write_domain != 0)
- i915_gem_object_move_to_flushing(obj);
- else
- i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(obj);
- }
+ if (obj->base.write_domain != 0)
+ i915_gem_object_move_to_flushing(obj);
+ else
+ i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(obj);
+ }
+ } while (seqno != ring->get_seqno(ring));
if (unlikely(ring->trace_irq_seqno &&
i915_seqno_passed(seqno, ring->trace_irq_seqno))) {
@@ -2000,6 +1998,10 @@ i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
ring->trace_irq_seqno = 0;
}
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ring->sync_seqno); i++)
+ if (seqno >= ring->sync_seqno[i])
+ ring->sync_seqno[i] = 0;
+
WARN_ON(i915_verify_lists(ring->dev));
}
--
1.7.4.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list